On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 01:55:15PM -0800, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 03:55:54PM -0600, Sam TH wrote:
> > and he didn't make it very
> > clear at all what you should do if the Artistic License wasn't
> > acceptable (which it isn't)
>
> Whoah whoah.
>
> 10.Example Licenses
>
> The "GPL", "BSD", and "Artistic" licenses are examples of licenses
> that we consider "free".
>
>
> Say again?
In that case, I guess Artistic is acceptable. But that is
unfortunate, given that this means that we have diverged from the FSF
analysis, something that I don't think we do elsewhere. I'll look
through the mailing list archives.
In that case, the xodo statment is definitely ok.
sam th
sam@uchicago.edu
http://www.abisource.com/~sam/
GnuPG Key:
http://www.abisource.com/~sam/key
Attachment:
pgpmksvXceDda.pgp
Description: PGP signature