(I'd trim the CC list but it looks like it was intended to be this long; go figure...) On Feb 25, Sam TH wrote: > On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 01:55:15PM -0800, Aaron Lehmann wrote: > > Whoah whoah. > > > > 10.Example Licenses > > > > The "GPL", "BSD", and "Artistic" licenses are examples of licenses > > that we consider "free". > > > > > > Say again? > > In that case, I guess Artistic is acceptable. But that is > unfortunate, given that this means that we have diverged from the FSF > analysis, something that I don't think we do elsewhere. I'll look > through the mailing list archives. May I suggest that we get this author to adopt the Clarified Artistic License, which everyone agrees IS free and furthermore is GPL-compatible... see ncftp for a copy if you haven't seen it. Chris -- Chris Lawrence <cnlawren@olemiss.edu> - http://www.lordsutch.com/chris/ Instructor and Doctoral Student, Political Science, Univ. of Mississippi 208 Deupree Hall - 662-915-5949
Attachment:
pgpuGerAbzgH_.pgp
Description: PGP signature