Re: FAQ.html and MANUAL.html, was Re: fwd: Re: Re: Please review changed man-file of w3m
markus.hiereth@freenet.de wrote:
> I went another time through the descriptions, made
>
> - the "within a" "in a" replacement
>
> - replaced "rendered copy of page" by "rendered copy of document" as
> elsewhere, we speak of pages as the part of a document which is
> displayed on the screen
Yes, makes sense.
> - replaced "relative URL" as it contains a contradiction within
> itself. as the letter U stands for unique. "relative addresse" or
> "relative path" fits better.
Actually it's "Uniform", and besides, one thing can easily be unique
relative to a given context (for instance, within the context of this
email the pronoun "I" has a unique referent).
Nonetheless, swapping from the jargon term "URL" to something in plain
English is probably an improvement... Except that "addresse" is
correctly spelled "address" in English (and "adresse" in French).
[...]
>> GOTO_RELATIVE,0,,Go to relative addresse,Open relative addresse in a new buffer
[...]
>> TAB_GOTO_RELATIVE,0,,Open relative addresse in new tab,Open relative addresse in a new tab
[...]
s/addresse/address/g
--
JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package
Reply to: