Re: bind9 1:9.5.0.dfsg-1: Please translate debconf PO for the package bind9
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 08:48:48AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> LaMont, what happened with these reviewed templates ?
I've attached the latest copy of them here, and would welcome additional
feedback, with the hope of getting them out for translation next week.
Does that sound reasonable?
It's entirely possible that I'm missing an edit or two from the last
round of feedback - I think I have all of it, though I may have missed
some. Feel free to point that out.
> During last days, I've seen a bind9 upload, but it had old-style
> templates with many things we actually "fixed" during this review.
The upload I did a week before the reviews began finally got processed
out of NEW. :(
> So, apparently, the reviewed templates were not used.
They didn't even exist at the time the upload was done...
> If you want, I can handle a translation update round. The only thing
> to confirm before is...what templates should be used. If you use a VCS
> for bind9 packaging, I can volunteer to handle things out in it.
> (same remarks about needed upload for l10n also apply to postfix,
> btw...:-))
Yes. as it currently sits, the pending upload for postfix is all l10n.
I'll be reviewing the bug list tonight and seeing if there is anything
else that should get fixed in this round, then upload this weekend. In
the meantime, maybe another translation or two will show up.
lamont
Template: bind9/start-as-user
Type: string
Default: bind
_Description: User account for running the BIND9 daemon:
The default is to run the BIND9 daemon (named) under the 'bind'
user account. To use a different account, please enter the
appropriate username.
Template: bind9/different-configuration-file
Type: string
_Description: Other startup options for named:
Please provide any additional options (other than username) that should
be passed to the BIND9 daemon (named) on startup.
Template: bind9/run-resolvconf
Type: boolean
Default: false
_Description: Should resolv.conf settings be overridden?
If this machine moves around, should the resolver be forced to use the
local BIND9 daemon (named) rather than what the current connection
recommends?
Reply to: