[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#426491: ucf: [debconf_rewrite] Debconf templates review

>>> _Description: What would you like to do about ${BASENAME}?

>> "Action for ${BASENAME}:". The main point was not turning the
>> prompt into neutral wording but *first* avoiding the
>> interrogative form. 

How about "What to do with ${BASENAME}:" as a compromise?

(Posted to d-l-e only, to see if anyone else likes the idea)
Ankh kak! (Ancient Egyptian blessing)

Reply to: