[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#426491: ucf: [debconf_rewrite] Debconf templates review

Quoting Christian Perrier (bubulle@debian.org):
> > _Description: What would you like to do about ${BASENAME}?
> My last concern is that one. We proposed "Action for
> ${BASENAME}:". The main point was not turning the prompt into neutral
> wording but *first* avoiding the interrogative form.

Manoj, if you manage to free some time for this, I would appreciate to
have your word here. 

We can either use the templates you proposed, with "What would you
like to do about ${BASENAME}?", despite my concerns....or replace this
with the proposed "Action for ${BASENAME}:"

I have no strong desire to enforce anything but I just want to launch
the translation update round...

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: