>
> Here are the current versions, where I think I have incorporated
> most of the changes. I have stuck with "Debian policy mandates ...",
> since it is really a debian policy to preserve user changes to
> configuration files; and I did not want to get into too much detail
> about which particular policy document does the mandating.
Manoj, sorry for being insisting but the work on ucf is pending in the
various debconf review I'm currently handling. It is pending because
of the indecision I have about the very very final version of
templates.
I'll certainly see you at Debconof but we both know that it can be
hectic enough for making it difficult to sort such issues out.
So, can you mention me whether the templates.master file that you sent
in the mail I'm answering to is your final version or if you're OK
with the "Action on ${BASENAME}:"final change which I proposed after
it?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature