On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 02:31:44PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > be very clear. also, we can send a patch to the upstream as well, and > > see what they think of having a builtin mount... also, are there > > any other alternatives? i think > I hope. But this is really outside of my field of interest / knowledge. okay, so i guess we need an authorative "yes, busybox will work" or "no, we really need ash for the time being" from herr knoppers, or someone else knowledgable... sean
Attachment:
pgpWCDMIG_i4F.pgp
Description: PGP signature