[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: New maintainer for ARM

On Sun, 2011-05-08 at 02:14 +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
> Hi,
> 2011/5/5 Arnaud Patard <arnaud.patard@rtp-net.org>:
> > hmm... I didn't notice this bug. The ARM options are enabled by default
> > like the other options. I don't know if it can have some side effects at
> > run time. I guess it should be fine otherwise some Kconfig patching will
> > be needed (I'm thinking of the ARMTHUMB decoder option)
> This bug has first to be fixed in common code, which has happen on SVN trunk.
> We need to enable on armel/armhf common file: (sounds about right?)
> Would it be sensible to add ... ?
> #. "Additional option for memory-constrained systems"
> I think it would be interesting to have one armel/armhf common config,
> but I have not yet looked into that.

We do.  The Kconfig files for armhf are armel/config, armhf/config.


Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: