Re: 2.6.19, kernel-package problems and what are our plans for etch ...

[Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 09:35:56AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>         What architecture line are we talking about here? Is there a
>>  bug report number I can refer to to refresh my memory on this issue?
> 
> ...
> 
>>         Again, what is broken about EXTRAVERSION? Which bug reports
>>  are we talking about?
> 
> ...
> 
>>         I'd be happy to look at why bits of the build process take
>>  longer than a raw build without make-kpkg -- which bug number was
>>  this reported under?
> 
> Manoj, you see, this is part of the problem. Nearer integration of the
> kernel-package maintainer and kernel team, or you being part of the kernel
> team, doesn't necessarily mean communicating via bug reports.

What's wrong with filing bugreports?

You seem to argue that keeping record of bugs is wrong is replaceable
with coordination on a mailinglist, spiced up with IRC conversations.



I disagree.

Teaming up is great, but does not replace the core routines in Debian.
It just glues them better together. IMHO.


 - Jonas

- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFiXJgn7DbMsAkQLgRAukGAJ9WyRa3Y9KFuGsztQbyZieqGSyxXgCfVVRA
MgDj3Vbrv8sp6Kg2RBXyjrM=
=9wGi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----