On Mon 17 Sep 2012 23:45:26 Nick Boyce escribió: [snip] > Thanks for the explanation - I think I'm beginning to get the hang of it > now, though would very much like to understand how some function names can > remain unresolvable while others in the same package (libglib in this > instance) are not. Maybe they're private functions of some sort, or maybe > the compiler can be told that some names are of no interest. I guess I'll > understand better by writing a KDE program or two Normally just missing dbg packages. And it's not directly related to KDE programs but to compiled apps (well, at least in C and C++). Kinds regards, Lisandro. -- Primero te ignorarán, luego se reirán, luego te combatirán, luego ganarás. Mahatma Gandhi Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.