Re: kmail instance separately starting
Andy Parkins wrote:
> On Wednesday 2006 August 16 12:37, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
>> Did you file a bug for this ?
> I'm not entirely sure it's fair to call it a bug. Kopete needs the address
> book, the address book needs kmail. Hence kopete starts kmail. What else
> could it do?
> I believe that KDE4 is going to address this problem by separating the data
> holding parts of the PIM applications into a separate server. That way
> kopete won't need to start kmail, it will just attach to the server in
> exactly the same way kmail/kabc itself will.
Yes, but we still can file it as a wishlist bug. That way the feature will get
proper attention and will have a higher possibility to get fixed faster.
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com
"Necessity is the mother of invention."
"Stealing logic from one person is plagiarism, stealing from many is research."
"The great are those who achieve the impossible, the petty are those who
cannot - rrs"