[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: kmail instance separately starting

On Wednesday 16 August 2006 15:38, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Andy Parkins wrote:
> > On Wednesday 2006 August 16 12:37, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> >> Did you file a bug for this ?
> >
> > I'm not entirely sure it's fair to call it a bug.  Kopete needs the
> > address book, the address book needs kmail.  Hence kopete starts kmail. 
> > What else could it do?
> >
> > I believe that KDE4 is going to address this problem by separating the
> > data holding parts of the PIM applications into a separate server.  That
> > way kopete won't need to start kmail, it will just attach to the server
> > in exactly the same way kmail/kabc itself will.
> Yes, but we still can file it as a wishlist bug. That way the feature will
> get proper attention and will have a higher possibility to get fixed
> faster.

The problem is very likely already filed at bugs.kde.org, at least the PIM 
developers are aware of it.

However, as it would require rewriting the IMAP access, it is not going to be 
solved in KDE3 AFAIK


Attachment: pgpIjrjOLzCeP.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: