Le 12/05/2013 18:25, tony mancill a écrit : > A question for the list... There are a number rdeps on the current > glassfish binary packages. Is there any reason to keep GF 2 in the > archive? That is, should there be a new package for glassfish3, or > should the 3.x update replace the existing glassfish [1] package? I would go for a glassfish3 package, this saves the burden to handle the migration from 2.x to 3.x. Emmanuel Bourg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature