On 05/11/2013 08:43 AM, Markus Karg wrote: > Understood. How to find out whether any other people currently work on > the same idea? Hi Markus, You're definitely in the right place. In addition to the other suggestions in this thread, I recommend that you start by generating a list dependencies and build dependencies for GF 3.1.2. Oftentimes one of the most difficult parts of packaging $foo is that it requires the addition of multiple $bars not yet available in the Debian. For any of the $bar packages needed for GF 3.x, you can file RFP or ITP bugs and cc: the debian-java list. A question for the list... There are a number rdeps on the current glassfish binary packages. Is there any reason to keep GF 2 in the archive? That is, should there be a new package for glassfish3, or should the 3.x update replace the existing glassfish [1] package? Thank you, tony [1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/glassfish.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature