On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 08:44:08AM -0700, Raquel wrote: > On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 11:23:52 -0400 > Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@connexer.com> wrote: > > > > > In any case, I really would be interested in hearing from people > > who have managed to get a spam filtering setup going that allows > > only a 0.66% false negative rate. > > > > Regards, > > > > -Roberto > > > > Reducing SPAM on the general mail server is not as easy as reducing > SPAM on my list server. The lists I host experience no/zero/nil > SPAM if they have their list setup properly. It can be done. > Is that because the range of what is considered Ham on a list server is smaller than in more general usage? I know that there are other possibilities, like making lists subscription-only, which may or may not work depending on your audience. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature