Re: More sorbs blacklisting [signed]
Charles Chambers [c] wrote:
[cut]
addressing it with them, or consider changing them. He who has the
gold, makes the rules.
that's why we've got the spam as an issue, right?
all we do is to tremble, make enourmous efforts to blacklist and
whitelist, to graylist, pinklist, redlist, bluelist, pornlist, gaylist,
viagralist...
consider making "goodlist" - it seems that if not at the moment, but in
the near future, this will be the shortest one.
i am not joking. just think about it as a reverse registration. if you
want to have a mailserver in the isp's netblock, you do register it with
the netblock "owner". if you do spam - you are "grayed out" in
additional list. if your isp does not exclude you from their list of
registered mailservers, or you do not fix the issue, your isp got in the
gray. same shit but with one major diffference. you are listed as "good"
_manually_. nor as of it now - all of the hosts can send mail and we are
suspicious about all of them.
so, you buy "pro dsl" - you have a "mail server package". you "activate
it" and your isp lists you in their dns as "mail server" - and you can
send mail as a "server". all others must use different, also registered
server to do it.
pretty sure that this is not new idea. why we are wasting our time just
to make spammers life more funny?
we are placing single doors on a bare plains to STOP "bad guys", instead
of making fence and making doors only for the "good ones".
[cut]
Reply to: