Re: spamassassin memory leak bug with bayes
Is it possible that it is because of grsec and acl patches that I use to my
2.4.26 kernel? Or I have to a make different MailScanner configuration if I
run it inside of a chroot?
Dmitry
On Friday 23 July 2004 02:03, Michelle Konzack <linux4michelle@freenet.de>
wrote:
> Hello Dmitry,
>
> Am 2004-07-23 00:50:51, schrieb Dmitry Golubev:
> >Hello,
> >
> >1. Running exim4 with MailScanner without Spamassassin - OK
> >2. Running exim4 + MailScanner + Spamassassin... hmm... well that kind of
> >behavior... In this case MailScanner eats up all my 1GB of RAM and my 2GB
> > on swap, and also all my CPU (Xeon 2.4GHz with HyperThreading enabled).
> > Nothing is logged, nothing shows something is wrong
>
> Hmmm, I have a Duron 1600 with 128 MByte of Memory and 200 MByte of
> SWAP.
>
> Has 4 Domains, and around 30-40 $USER.
> In plus there are 36 local $USER which use 176 E-Mails fetched from
> differnt ISP's
>
> I am using courier-{mta,imap,pop3,mlm,authpostgresql,webadmin} and
> have tried to fuck my Server wit 20000 Worms and Viruses and around
> 1.000.000 Spams... Using f-prot and spamassassin 2.63 via spamc.
>
> The Virus and Mail-Sending Testserver was a Athlon 2000. All two
> Servers are connected to a 3Com SuperStack III with GigaBit Ports.
>
> LoadAverage was around 5.3 on the Server. Exactly, it is my local
> FileServer where the /home is stored and exported via NFS.
>
> >3. Fighting with it for a 4 or 5 hours found that version 2.60 (note that
> > I have version 2.63) had a bug that could lead to this when bayes is
> > enabled... Disabled bayes, and that it...
> >
> >It seams it is really a bug, but please suggest any workaround...
>
> In 2.60 or 2.63 ?
> There is nothing which eat up memory in 2.63...
>
> But it seems, there is a bug in 2.99
>
> >Dmitry
>
> Greetings
> Michelle
Reply to: