Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?
It's a good paper to start for learning about basics of spam blocking.
As you already mentioned: most of it is still a must for every mailserver today.
But interesting: 4xx instead of 5xx is used successful by greylisting!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Yves Junqueira" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 12:12 AM
Subject: Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?
> This could be also of interest. Although it is old (feb 99), most of
> its recomendations are valid. Others have not yet come to a consensus,
> like using 4xx error codes instead of 5xx for denying spam. Anyway, it
> instigates more profund analysis from the mail admin.
> What are your thoughts, readers?
> > > On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:45:40 +0200, Niccolo Rigacci <email@example.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Please correct me if I'm wrong; I'm searching for RFCs which
> > > > propose effective ways to block spam and viruses.
> > > >
> Yves Junqueira
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-isp-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org