Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?
It's a good paper to start for learning about basics of spam blocking.
As you already mentioned: most of it is still a must for every mailserver today.
But interesting: 4xx instead of 5xx is used successful by greylisting!
Christian
----- Original Message -----
From: "Yves Junqueira" <yves.junqueira@gmail.com>
To: <debian-isp@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 12:12 AM
Subject: Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?
> This could be also of interest. Although it is old (feb 99), most of
> its recomendations are valid. Others have not yet come to a consensus,
> like using 4xx error codes instead of 5xx for denying spam. Anyway, it
> instigates more profund analysis from the mail admin.
>
> http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2505.html
>
> What are your thoughts, readers?
>
>
> > > On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:45:40 +0200, Niccolo Rigacci <niccolo@rigacci.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Please correct me if I'm wrong; I'm searching for RFCs which
> > > > propose effective ways to block spam and viruses.
> > > >
>
> --
> Yves Junqueira
> www.lynx.com.br
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-isp-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
>
Reply to: