Re: xfs vs jfs performance
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 03:53, Thedore Knab wrote:
> I am moving away from using ext3 on my servers due to its high overhead and lower
> performance. I am considering either XFS or JFS.
Just curious, but why is everyone avoiding ReiserFS? I know RH dumped
reiser in favor of ext3, but I know of hard-core RH admins who are going
back to reiser because it worked better for them than ext3 (more
reliability apparently, also more features like live-resize with LVM).
I know reiser had some problems earlier, but it's had more time to knock
the bugs out and seems fine to me now. I know XFS and JFS have a longer
history than reiser, but not on Linux, where they are relative newbies.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ABO: finger abo@minkirri.apana.org.au for more info, including pgp key
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: