Re: xfs vs jfs performance
12 Feb 2003 09:54:37 +1100
Donovan Baarda <email@example.com>:
> On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 03:53, Thedore Knab wrote:
> > I am moving away from using ext3 on my servers due to its
> > high overhead and lower performance. I am considering either
> > XFS or JFS.
> Just curious, but why is everyone avoiding ReiserFS? I know RH
> dumped reiser in favor of ext3, but I know of hard-core RH
> admins who are going back to reiser because it worked better
> for them than ext3 (more reliability apparently, also more
> features like live-resize with LVM).
> I know reiser had some problems earlier, but it's had more time
> to knock the bugs out and seems fine to me now. I know XFS and
> JFS have a longer history than reiser, but not on Linux, where
> they are relative newbies.
Still no quota support? Haven't checked recently, I admit,