firstname.lastname@example.org (Donovan Baarda) writes:
> Though I use uw-imapd instead of Courier. The general consensus is Courier
> is better, but I went with uw-imapd because it was "lighter", and I had
> legacy non-Maildir mailboxes.
> Courier is nearly 1MB installed including ssl and support packages, compared
> to 350K for uw-imapd-ssl. Courier uses a seperate authdaemon and
> serverdaemon, whereas uw-imapd uses the normal inetd. Courier looked like
> overkill for my system.
But how big are UW's c-client library files? I'm pretty sure that,
including the protocol libraries, uw-imap ends up being larger than
Brian Nelson <email@example.com>