Re: RAID & Hard disk performance
Not to start a holy war, but there are real reasons to use SCSI.
The big ones are
Much larger MTBF, faster access times due to higher spindle speeds, better
bus management (eg 2 drives can perform tasks at once unlike IDE), Hot
Swapable (This is HUGE) and more cache on the drive.
I'll stop now before I start that war :-)
At 11:20 AM 11/4/01 +1100, you wrote:
<quote who="Russell Coker">
> There's a number of guides that tell you about hdparm and what DMA is,
> you already know that stuff then there's little good documentation.
"Oh bum." :)
> Then on the rare occasions that I do meet people who know this stuff
> reasonably well they seem to spend all their time trying to convince me
> SCSI is better than IDE (regardless of benchmark results). :(
Heh, there's a religious war waiting to happen.
> >  http://people.redhat.com/alikins/system_tuning.html
I've just found that iostat (in unstable's sysstat package) supports
extended I/O properties in /proc if you have sct's I/O monitoring patches.
Unfortunately, the last one on his ftp site is for 2.3.99-preBlah. I sent an
email to lkml last night to see if there's a newer patch - I'll follow up
here if so.
Wars end, love lasts.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com