Re: Bug#660965: Exploring the possibility of an l10n upload of xfonts-traditional to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs (and debconf templates changes)

[Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>]

Christian PERRIER writes ("Re: Bug#660965: Exploring the possibility of an l10n upload of xfonts-traditional to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs (and debconf templates changes)"):
> But, as there are many packages which I want to focus on (with the
> release in perspective), I would really love to have one less..:-)

How about you focus on a different package and if I haven't done
anything reasonable within the next few weeks you do an NMU if you
feel like it.  To be honest there are other packages whose users are
much more likely to benefit from you translation effort and I would
urge you to spend your time there.

> On the other hand, I'm reluctant to NMU because I still have doubts
> that the very final version of debconf templates is really what you
> want to have. Also, I'm reluctant because NMUing a quite active
> maintainer is not something I'm really happy to do...

If you don't update the English language texts then I have no problem
at all with an NMU.  If I do update the English language templates
myself later, I can unfuzz the translations myself (since you have
helpfully told me how to do that).

Regards,
Ian.