[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#660965: Exploring the possibility of an l10n upload of xfonts-traditional to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs (and debconf templates changes)

> To summarize all this, I'm not hardly insisting on NMUing the package
> (because I really fear doing something you wouldn't agree with...). My
> main concern is having these translations incorporated at some not too
> far point in the future so that I can move my radar to another
> "target"...:-)

Ian, I'm not really sure about what to do, frankly speaking.

On one hand, I really would like to see xfonts-traditional move out of
my radar and get all these translations in, and voilà.

On the other hand, I'm reluctant to NMU because I still have doubts
that the very final version of debconf templates is really what you
want to have. Also, I'm reluctant because NMUing a quite active
maintainer is not something I'm really happy to do...

But, as there are many packages which I want to focus on (with the
release in perspective), I would really love to have one less..:-)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: