[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Version numbers for translations (was: Re: debconf PO translations for the package pam



Hello,
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 11:26:10PM +0200, Hans F. Nordhaug wrote:
> * Clytie Siddall <clytie@riverland.net.au> [2007-09-01]:
> > 
> > On 01/09/2007, at 4:01 PM, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > 
> > >>>>Project-Id-Version: PACKAGE VERSION\n"
> > >>
> > >>>What's the project version?
> > >>
> > >>These headers aren't very important to me, but to answer your  
> > >>question, this
> > >>translation is for pam 0.99.7.1-4 (and above).
> Me too. (Maybe not a very useful message, but I just wanted to make it
> clear that Clytie isn't alone in wanting the version number.) I also
> want it in the Project-Id-Version.
> 
> Hans
> > 
> > So please continue to quote the package version number in the update  
> > email subject line. :)

I second this motion for the same reasons Clytie and Hans cited.
Please continue sending version numbers (and if I have a wish, could
those be moved more to the beginning of the subject? Currently they
often are at the border of the line break for 80 chars, i.e. the
package name is before, the version name after, which makes it more
difficult than necessary to copy and paste. Thanks).

Greetings

           Helge

-- 
      Dr. Helge Kreutzmann                     debian@helgefjell.de
           Dipl.-Phys.                   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
        64bit GNU powered                     gpg signed mail preferred
           Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: