[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: debian-l10n-galician

On Mon, Dec 25, 2006 at 02:17:04AM -0100, Suso wrote:
> Referred to the "enough interest" concept I did not find nothing about in
> the docs; so I'll simply show my openess to comply to that requirement in
> any way it might be done. If a personal meeting is needed, I'll can
> arrange.

No documentation will tell you how the different teams responsible for the
BTS (including list managers) fix bugs. But it obvious that a bug asking for
a list has to demonstrate somehow that there is really a need for such a
list. Each list created in the Debian servers incur administrative costs and
it doesn't make sense to spend time and effort for a four-man list that could
be solved with an e-mail alias and requires no archiving.

That's why I suggested you ask fellow translators to add information to the
BTS when you submit the bug. You should also point to existing mailing lists
covering the need for debian-l10n-galician.



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: