Re: Summary of Debconf i18n activities
On 5/24/06, Christian Perrier <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> 1. Please replace i18n by l10n everywhere.
> 2. Please get the facts right, this mail summarizes
> what has been discussed in Debconf6 by attendees,
> not on this list.
Would you please decide what you are doing?
>If some of the participants want to add stuff or correct me, please do
>so. Please do not add ideas that HAVE NOT been discussed at Debconf.
:-o what do you mean? is the idea set complete?
No. But this is meant to be the report of Debconf discussions, not a
general report about recent i18n activities.
> IMO you should remove the 2nd paragraph about WordForge.
> We must prevent translators from working on documents
> which are already handled by other groups. Hopefully
> we will cooperate with other l10n infrastructures one
> day, but at the moment this will cause trouble.
I prefer keeping it. Even though this is certainly not the immediate
goal, having a structure that is though from the beginning as a
possible distributed system aimed at getting different l10n projects
to collaborate and communicate is one of the key features in WordForge
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein