Quoting Denis Barbier (barbier@linuxfr.org): > > Not exactly. Even though the discussion in the list are not easy to > > summarize, I have looked at the ideas you exposed youself in your > > summary mails, and they have been mentioned during the various > > discussions at Debconf. This is why I consider that some discussions > > from the list have lead to this summary. > > Exactly, this is what I said in the sentence you erased. People > who will read your mail but do not follow this list will have a > different reading though. > If you still disagree, please remove my name from your mail. I'm afraid I'm missing the point here. I'm actually explaining that my summary did not only take into account the Debconf discussions but also some of the discussions in the list and more precisely your useful contributions (most of them indeed mention needs that have also be mentioned in Debconf discussions). This is what makes IMHO needed to mention your name in the summary among contributors, given that I did use your contributions for writing the summary...:-)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature