fre 2003-03-07 klockan 15.06 skrev Michael Bramer: > not a bug in technical sense. IMHO the spec allow this. > But sorry, I don't understand this part: 'it's a bug for the "text" > template type, since it's non-interactive' > Can you explain this? I meant "I don't think it's a bug for a 'text' template to have an empty extended description". Take anna for example: Template: anna/progress_title Type: text _Description: Installing modules Template: anna/progress_step_retr Type: text _Description: Retrieving ${PACKAGE} These strings are used with cdebconf progress bars, there's no reason to put an extended description on them. The debconf spec says "This template is a scrap of text that can be displayed to the user. It's intended to be used for mostly cosmetic reasons, touching up around other questions that are asked at the same time. Unlike a note, it isn't treated as something the user should definitely see. Less complex frontends may refuse to ever display this type of element." so I think you should be very very liberal about this. /Martin -- Martin Sjögren sjogren@debian.org -- marvin@dum.chalmers.se GPG key: http://www.mdstud.chalmers.se/~md9ms/gpg.html let hello = "hello" : hello in putStr (unlines hello)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel