Re: NMUs?

To: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>
Cc: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: NMUs?
From: Svante Signell <svante.signell@telia.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 16:16:27 +0200
Message-id: <1314108987.3517.112.camel@s1499.it.kth.se>
Reply-to: svante.signell@telia.com
In-reply-to: <20110819154805.GD4919@type.famille.thibault.fr>
References: <20110819111018.GB4919@type.famille.thibault.fr> <20110819111219.GC4919@type.famille.thibault.fr> <1313755994.3517.18.camel@s1499.it.kth.se> <20110819123654.GG4919@type.famille.thibault.fr> <1313758050.3517.43.camel@s1499.it.kth.se> <20110819125632.GI4919@type.famille.thibault.fr> <1313764065.3517.80.camel@s1499.it.kth.se> <20110819144049.GV4919@type.famille.thibault.fr> <20110819144254.GW4919@type.famille.thibault.fr> <1313768490.3517.100.camel@s1499.it.kth.se> <20110819154805.GD4919@type.famille.thibault.fr>

On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 17:48 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> I'll have a look at pvm if nobody beats me to it.
Thanks!

Referring to pvm, what about netpipe? There is a bug report #571449,
from 25 Feb 2010 with a patch from 10 May 2011 replacing netpipe's LAM
and MPICH1 packages with OpenMPI and MPICH2 packages. Maybe a 10-day
NMU? Of course this patch will change for all supported archs, not only
GNU/Hurd.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: NMUs?
  - From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>
- Re: NMUs?
  - From: Pino Toscano <pino@debian.org>

References:
- Re: opensp: openjade1.3 causes FTBFS on hurd-i386
  - From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>
- Re: NMUs?
  - From: Svante Signell <svante.signell@telia.com>
- Re: NMUs?
  - From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>
- Re: NMUs?
  - From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>
- Re: NMUs?
  - From: Svante Signell <svante.signell@telia.com>
- Re: NMUs?
  - From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: please update and check the multiarch patches for gcc-4.5
Next by Date: Re: NMUs?
Previous by thread: Re: NMUs?
Next by thread: Re: NMUs?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread