On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 01:24:54AM +0900, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote: > At Wed, 22 May 2002 14:12:01 +0200, > Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > > Depends on what you call a release and the reasons you have for > > releases. We actually release after every change we make to the Hurd, > > the latest release of the Hurd is always the version in CVS. GNU 0.2 > > is so old that I doubt that any non-Hurd hacker know it still exists > > today. > > I don't need such an explanation. I'm more familiar with the Hurd than > you, probably. Haven't you seen the list of Hurd developers in > Savannah? I just want to say that everybody can always get the latest version from CVS. Without a release people can still run the latest version, so we don't have to release for that. > I've already showed my opinion and wrote the URL relevant to it. If > you have any objection to me, describe your opinion more > specifically. It is not a good reason just that the Hurd has a CVS > repository. There is no sense in releasing the Hurd when it's not ready for release and IMHO this at least means the 1 GB limitation should be fixed. Jeroen Dekkers -- Jabber ID: jdekkers@jabber.org IRC ID: jeroen@openprojects GNU supporter - http://www.gnu.org
Attachment:
pgptsExjTJRRU.pgp
Description: PGP signature