[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ldconfig

Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> writes:

> Use of ldconfig is not portable. We should not encourage maintainers into
> Linux specific programming.

Ok. This, and especially that libtool can do them, has convinced me.

> That's an idea. Can you submit it as a bug report against libc0.2 (or
> whatever contains ldconfig now)?

I've expanded the script a bit, so that "ldconfig -X" and the like
still silently succeeds, and put in a --help message discussing the
issues. Could you review it (in bug#95189), particularly the
explanation? I don't want to spread pseudoauthorative falsehoods.


Attachment: signature.ng
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: