Re: g++ on the hurd?
On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 10:21:49PM -0500, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 03:27:33PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> was heard to say:
> > > What's the solution? ie, should libc0.2 be providing gconv-modules, or
> > > should gtk+ not depend on it on the Hurd?
> > Yes, libc0.2 should provide it. Please file a bug report.
> Ben Collins suggested that it would be better for libgtk1.2 not to depend
> on gconv-modules. I've actually compiled a version for my own use which
> doesn't, and it seems to work..
Then the bug should be reassigned (either by you or Ben) to libgtk1.2 and
retitled to "remove dependency on gconv-modules". Also, bug reports should
be filed for all other packages depending on gconv-modules.
> > > As far as I know, sawfish is threadless. wmaker might be better standalone,
> > > though, since sawfish doesn't have a pager (or I suppose I could get spager
> > > working..)
> sawfish, unfortunately, depends on rep-gtk, which needs Gnome to compile.
> Once compiled it shouldn't depend on Gnome, though. I think.
Gnomes is big. I build most of the basic gnome libraries and the gnome core
itself without a lot of problems. Sorting out the remaining problems and
submitting bugs for them (I didn't) is an easy task.
> wmaker, OTOH, compiles perfectly and works nicely.
Please upload everything you do, and let Jeff know about the source package
name so he can keep it up to date.
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org email@example.com
Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org firstname.lastname@example.org