[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: g++ on the hurd?



On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 08:48:18PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> was heard to say:
> >   Ben Collins suggested that it would be better for libgtk1.2 not to depend
> > on gconv-modules.  I've actually compiled a version for my own use which
> > doesn't, and it seems to work..
> 
> Then the bug should be reassigned (either by you or Ben) to libgtk1.2 and
> retitled to "remove dependency on gconv-modules". Also, bug reports should
> be filed for all other packages depending on gconv-modules.

  Oh, sorry.  I forgot to mention that Ben already reassigned it.. 

  anyway, should I upload the gtk packages?  (sorry to keep asking so many
questions!)  I'm not sure what to do if I have to tweak the source to build
it, as in this case..
  (and besides, gtk+ will hopefully be fixed in its next version by the
   maintainer)

> Gnomes is big. I build most of the basic gnome libraries and the gnome core
> itself without a lot of problems. Sorting out the remaining problems and
> submitting bugs for them (I didn't) is an easy task.

  Do you have packages/information on this?  Did you use esound, or can
Gnome be compiled without it? (that was the major issue I encountered..)

  I believe you that Gnome doesn't work well on the Hurd, but I'd like to have
the libraries so programs with both Gnome and non-Gnome components can build
easily.

> >   wmaker, OTOH, compiles perfectly and works nicely.
> 
> Please upload everything you do, and let Jeff know about the source package
> name so he can keep it up to date.

  Ok.  (I just got a "wmaker INSTALLED" message from dinstall, as a matter
of fact..)

  "Jeff" == "Jeff Bailey", right?

  Daniel

-- 
/-------------------- Daniel Burrows <dburrows@brown.edu> --------------------\
|                   "Truly, you have a dizzying intellect."                   |
|                     -- "The Princess Bride"                                 |
\---------------------- A duck! -- http://www.python.org ---------------------/



Reply to: