[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: glibc 2.2 and gcc (Was Re: something completely different)

On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 09:19:08PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > Oh, and by the way, the libstdc++.so versioning madness isn't applied
> > > for the Hurd :-).  There's definitely no reason for a seperate
> > > libstdc++ package for glibc 2.2 on the Hurd.
> Why does hurd not have this problem? Does it have libstdc++? What is the
> soname of the library? If it's based on the libc version, like all the
> rest, then it will have that problem, just like everyone else.

ulysses:/gnu/lib# objdump -p libstdc++.so.2.10.0  | grep SONAME
  SONAME      libstdc++.so.2.10.0

The Hurd has not the long history of linux libc conversions, so we don't
need to carry the same amount of cruft with us. The libc soname is not
included in libstdc++ at all.


`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org Check Key server 
Marcus Brinkmann              GNU    http://www.gnu.org    for public PGP Key 
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de,     marcus@gnu.org    PGP Key ID 36E7CD09
http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Marcus.Brinkmann/       brinkmd@debian.org

Reply to: