[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: glibc 2.2 and gcc (Was Re: something completely different)

> Depend: hurd (>= 20000803)

Looks more appropriate, we don't want to force removal of hurd because of
a conflict resolution.

> > Oh, and by the way, the libstdc++.so versioning madness isn't applied
> > for the Hurd :-).  There's definitely no reason for a seperate
> > libstdc++ package for glibc 2.2 on the Hurd.

Why does hurd not have this problem? Does it have libstdc++? What is the
soname of the library? If it's based on the libc version, like all the
rest, then it will have that problem, just like everyone else.

/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  bcollins@debian.org  --  bcollins@openldap.org  --  bcollins@linux.com  '

Reply to: