Re: glibc 2.0.112 broken
>>>>> Marcus Brinkmann writes:
>> Are you sure this was due to glibc? Looking in boot-start.c, I
>> see that this message is caused only when you try using Roland's
>> experimental (and untested) --boot-command feature.
MB> I did not yet tried this feature at all, sorry. All I did was to
MB> install libc0.2_2.0.112 from Linux and rebooted.
Hmm. I guess that really means that 2.0.112 is broken. I'll test it
at home as soon as I get a chance.
Gordon Matzigkeit <firstname.lastname@example.org> //\ I'm a FIG (http://www.fig.org/)
Lovers of freedom, unite! \// I use GNU (http://www.gnu.org/)
[Unfortunately, www.fig.org is broken. Please stay tuned for details.]