Re: Moving alpha and hppa architectures to debian-ports.org
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:08 PM, dann frazier <dannf@dannf.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:33:23AM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
>> On 7/6/2011 4:24 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> >On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 11:12 AM, dann frazier<dannf@dannf.org> wrote:
>> >>Right - we have machines we should be able to use (peri/penalosa) -
>> >>they currently only build lenny updates today. And yeah, not having a
>> >>stable release will make managing these systems a bigger timesink, and
>> >>I won't be able to volunteer for that.
>> >>
>> >>DSA manages these machines for us, and it probably isn't feasible to
>> >>give non-DDs access to boxes building security updates. So, we'll
>> >>likely need to repurpose one of these machines and manage it under
>> >>debian-ports. That leaves us w/o a backup for lenny updates, but I can
>> >>setup a system here at home in a pinch. Once lenny support ends, both
>> >>machines could be allocated for debian-ports.
>> >[trimming CC list]
>> >
>> >Dan,
>> >
>> >So it looks like we have one machine that we could setup as a
>> >unstable/experimental buildd?
>> >
>> There is also a machine (rp3440) in the ESIEE test ring that might
>> make a good buildd machine
>> if security isn't too big an issue.
>
> I'd definitely recommend multiple systems. There's a lot of building
> to do..
So in summary we are going to have penalosa and ESIEE's rp3440 doing
builds for debian-ports?
I have asked Aurelien what is required for debian-ports on these
machines. I'll wait to see what he says.
Cheers,
Carlos.
Reply to: