Hi, looks like you are not using the git version of cabal-debian or are not using the "--official" flag... Am Freitag, den 09.01.2015, 16:03 +0000 schrieb Dmitry Bogatov: > Non-exhaustive list: > > #. Generated debian/control should use X-description and blurbs that works. > #. Absent debian/source/format that works > #. debian/changelog mentions upstream maintainer, not me that works party. With --official it mentions the DHG, but see https://github.com/ddssff/cabal-debian/issues/14 > #. I would prefer section by default `unknown` haskell is a good default, as it is correct in most cases. > #. Compat is 9, but debhelper depends >= 7.0 good point. Can you file an issue? > #. Priority is optional, extra is prefered. that works. So please build from David’s git repo; you’ll find that the tool is much better! > Well, this list may continue, if I notice something else repetive in > my workflow, so, despite my belive, that this is nice list to fix, > I would like to have ability fix it myself with library. I still don’t see why the "cabal-debian" couldn’t just do the right thing, and why it helps to build extra library packages and ship them to all our archives. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part