Hi, Am Freitag, den 09.01.2015, 13:55 +0300 schrieb Dmitry Bogatov: > * David Fox <ddssff@gmail.com> [2015-01-08 06:20:34-0800] > > Also, cabal-debian should be producing library debs, if it isn't there may > > be a bug. > > Seems I was not clear enough. I regret, that haskell-cabal-debian > *debian* source package provides only *cabal-debian* binary, without > *libghc-cabal-debian-dev*. I am working on fixing it. do we really need libghc-cabal-debian-dev? What other package is using it? Note that uploading Haskell library packages comes at a cost, e.g. testing migrations become larger, so we should only package libraries that have actual uses. Lots of Haskell programs define libraries in their .cabal file, but these are only meant to be used by the executable therein. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part