Hi. Il 20/05/2012 22:30, Joachim Breitner ha scritto: > But your packages might be somewhat second class citizens then. E.g. > when there is a coordinated change to all Haskell package it might > happen that do it only on those maintained in the group repositories, > and sliently expect you to have followed d-haskell and applied the > change to your packages (or spoken up in time if you diagree). > > In fact, if you are fine with that, I’d recommend that you do _not_ put > the DHG as the maintainer of the packages and hence take the full and > only responsibility for them, as you already did for haskell-ncurses. Actually, I don't agree here: I think that having a package co-maintained in DHG is anyway better than not, even if in a different infrastructure. However, here nomeata's word is by far more relevant than mine. :-) Gio. -- Giovanni Mascellani <mascellani@poisson.phc.unipi.it> Pisa, Italy Web: http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani Jabber: g.mascellani@jabber.org / giovanni@elabor.homelinux.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature