Good morning, Am Donnerstag, den 19.04.2012, 17:47 -0500 schrieb Stephen Paul Weber: > Somebody signing messages as Joachim Breitner wrote: > >Am Donnerstag, den 19.04.2012, 11:14 -0500 schrieb Stephen Paul Weber: > >The test can be abstracted, but not the flag, as that is (unfortunately) > >package-specific. > > Yeah, I thought as much. How useful would abstracting the test be? Not too important, I’d say; and maybe less opaque. Another option might be to talk to upstream and see if it makes sense to have GHC just ignore -threaded on architectures where that is not supported. > >> Finally, a line to install an extra documentation file. Since the *.cabal > >> does not know that this file is documentation, and it does not have a name > >> that immidiately identifies it as documentation (like README), I think > >> something custom is going to be required for that case no matter what. > > > >I think these two cases can go (or rather, stay) in > >debian/hlint.install, while the rest looks like it can go into > >hlibrary.mk. > > Oh, I see I was working with apt-get source hlint instead of what's in > darcs. Oops. Yes, that makes sense. For clarity, I have attached a patch > against the darcs version of the debian metadata that does this. > > And forget what I said about the library files, that must be a bug in the > version I got from apt-get source :) Strange, what version is that? 1.8.24-1 in unstable should be the same as in the darcs repository. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part