[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: hslogger_1.0.10-1_amd64.changes REJECTED



Hi,

Am Montag, den 18.04.2011, 23:26 +0530 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> Am Montag, den 18.04.2011, 19:31 +0200 schrieb Torsten Werner:
> > Am 18.04.2011 15:12, schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> > > ok, so I should mention it in the copyright file, but neither build nor
> > > install it – is that ok with the ftp team, or should I re-package the
> > > tarball without it, given that we have not verified that the .jar file
> > > can actually be built from the included sources (although it is likely
> > > the fact).
> > 
> > repackaging the tarball would be better because we cannot easily check
> > if it is redistributable at all.
> 
> sigh. I’ll look into that tomorrow, but in case someone in the DHG is
> faster, that would be appreciated.

uploaded with repacked tarball. Joey, when that is through NEW you
should be able to upload git-annex. And feel free to notify us about any
urgent or non-urgent Haskell packaging wishes.

Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: