[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: hslogger_1.0.10-1_amd64.changes REJECTED



Hi,

Am Montag, den 18.04.2011, 19:31 +0200 schrieb Torsten Werner:
> Am 18.04.2011 15:12, schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> > ok, so I should mention it in the copyright file, but neither build nor
> > install it – is that ok with the ftp team, or should I re-package the
> > tarball without it, given that we have not verified that the .jar file
> > can actually be built from the included sources (although it is likely
> > the fact).
> 
> repackaging the tarball would be better because we cannot easily check
> if it is redistributable at all.

sigh. I’ll look into that tomorrow, but in case someone in the DHG is
faster, that would be appreciated.

Also, John, in the long term it would save us work if that contrib part
is maybe put on the hslogger homepage only.

Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: