Hi, Am Freitag, den 03.07.2009, 17:34 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e > > If the group prefers Darcs, that's fine; I'll use > > it, but I'm not going to volunteer to set up infrastructure for it > > because I don't have time to do that. > > What's the infrastructure? I can do this too. I already have a space in > code.haskell.org that I use for my packages, and I can create a darcs > repository with all the debian/ parts of the haskell packages around. whoa, I didn’t want to set up a race here :-). I’d just wanted to make sure people have the chance to express their opinions so that we can find a consensus that’s supported by everyone. Of the four people that have commented, John and Ravi are in support of git, Marco prefers Darcs and I would have liked to try that as well, but I can also live with git. Given the work that John has put into it by now, I’d say we go that route and thank him for setting it up so quickly. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil