Re: New Hamlib package
Hi all,
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:18:53AM +0200, Enrico Rossi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > yes - meantime I contacted with Andreas (aeb@), and he asked me
> > > that don't do anything before we don't discuss. So I'm lookign
> > > for his answer.
>
> meanwhile I have built both the hamlib and wsjtx which is also present
> in salsa.
>
> Hamlib may need some fix for lintian warnings, but as far as I can tell,
> it works with buster, tested on fldigi and wsjtx on my rig.
yes, there are several warnings, most of them are exists in
previous versions, but if you can help me, I'll fix them.
Eg:
W: hamlib source: python-foo-but-no-python3-foo python-libhamlib2
Hamlib bindings supports Python 3, but you have to build in 2
steps, if you want to use both Python2 and Python3. I don't know,
how could we integrate this to a Debian package.
or another:
W: libhamlib2++c2: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libhamlib++2
I don't know why and where comes this name conventions to Hamlib,
but didn't wanted to change them.
> wsjtx package IMO need some work instead, even if it working.
I think the WSJTX is a bit old version (1.8). I've started to
work it on, sent a mail to here, but didn't get any relevant
answer.
Anyway, the WSJT-X current version is 1.9.1, I've made a package
from that upstream:
http://ha2os.ha5kkc.com/Wsjtx/
> Ervin, is the wsjtx in salsa the same you built some times ago?
no, I got my account since 3 weeks ago, and just started to know
the Salsa and git-buildpackage flow. The current packages built
by the "old way" :).
73, Ervin
HA2OS
Reply to: