Re: New Hamlib package
Hi Enrico,
On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 05:35:14PM +0200, Enrico Rossi wrote:
> Hi Ervin,
>
> I'm trying to rebuild your package and I have some questions, but first
> of all thanks for the work :)
welcome - but I think you (or any other ham) don't need to thanks
:)).
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 11:29:56PM +0200, Ervin Hegedüs wrote:
> > the Hamlib new version had been released (3.2), I've made the
> > package with several modifications.
>
> I see that salsa is not updated, nor with the 3.1-8 neither with 3.2-1,
> is there a reason for it or it is just.. waiting? Eventually is it ok
> if I (or others) fix that?
yes - meantime I contacted with Andreas (aeb@), and he asked me
that don't do anything before we don't discuss. So I'm lookign
for his answer.
> Building the 3.2 version from the Build-Depends I have also to add
> texinfo because it is looking for makeinfo.
I don't know which version what you found (and where), about two
weeks ago I've uploaded a new version of this package, and as I
remember, I've added the texinfo too - the pbuilder showed the
errors as well :)
> debian/libhamlib2-tcl.examples wants to install
> bindings/tcltest.tcl which is missing. The file is already copied in the
> roles. It should be deleted.
sorry, I don't understand this exactly - I also ran this bug, and
fixed in last version.
> diff --git a/debian/lua-hamlib2.examples b/debian/lua-hamlib2.examples
> index 8f052c7..0524b1d 100644
> --- a/debian/lua-hamlib2.examples
> +++ b/debian/lua-hamlib2.examples
> @@ -1 +1 @@
> -bindings/luatest.py
> +bindings/luatest.lua
interesting - I'll check it again at next weekend.
After I finished with pbuilder, I've installed all bindings*
packages (Perl, Python, Lua, Tcl), and checked all examples on a
clean system, but didn't found any problem.
Please let me check it again in next days. May be aeb@ will see
this e-mail, and can help to fix the questions.
The packages are here:
http://ha2os.ha5kkc.com/Hamlib/
the date of building is 10th of June.
> Thanks
> 73 de iu4jru
73, Ervin
HA2OS
Reply to: