Re: New Hamlib package
Howdy all!
I did the last round of work on wsjtx - I got most of it building and working, then removed the binaries for which there was no manpage and that were only supplied as examples (as far as I could tell).
Then work and life got in the way and will continue to do so for the forseeable future - Feel free to pick it up and carry on!
Cheers,
DH
--
Hibby
d@vehibberd.com
MM3ZRZ
On Wed, 11 Jul 2018, at 9:43 AM, Ervin Hegedüs wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:18:53AM +0200, Enrico Rossi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > > yes - meantime I contacted with Andreas (aeb@), and he asked me
> > > > that don't do anything before we don't discuss. So I'm lookign
> > > > for his answer.
> >
> > meanwhile I have built both the hamlib and wsjtx which is also present
> > in salsa.
> >
> > Hamlib may need some fix for lintian warnings, but as far as I can tell,
> > it works with buster, tested on fldigi and wsjtx on my rig.
>
> yes, there are several warnings, most of them are exists in
> previous versions, but if you can help me, I'll fix them.
>
> Eg:
>
> W: hamlib source: python-foo-but-no-python3-foo python-libhamlib2
>
> Hamlib bindings supports Python 3, but you have to build in 2
> steps, if you want to use both Python2 and Python3. I don't know,
> how could we integrate this to a Debian package.
>
> or another:
>
> W: libhamlib2++c2: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libhamlib++2
>
>
> I don't know why and where comes this name conventions to Hamlib,
> but didn't wanted to change them.
>
> > wsjtx package IMO need some work instead, even if it working.
>
> I think the WSJTX is a bit old version (1.8). I've started to
> work it on, sent a mail to here, but didn't get any relevant
> answer.
>
> Anyway, the WSJT-X current version is 1.9.1, I've made a package
> from that upstream:
>
> http://ha2os.ha5kkc.com/Wsjtx/
>
> > Ervin, is the wsjtx in salsa the same you built some times ago?
>
> no, I got my account since 3 weeks ago, and just started to know
> the Salsa and git-buildpackage flow. The current packages built
> by the "old way" :).
>
>
> 73, Ervin
> HA2OS
>
Reply to: