Re: New version available - TrustedQSL v1.14.1
How long until this makes it to testing, or stable?
--
Thanks,
Dave
For Amateur Radio equipment reviews and setups see:
http://www.nk7z.net
On Sat, 2013-06-01 at 21:14 -0400, Robert Mead wrote:
> On 6/1/2013 9:03 PM, Kamal Mostafa wrote:
> > Hi Robert-
> >
> > Wow, what timing! I have actually been working on the Debian packaging
> > for the new TrustedQSL 1.14.1 all afternoon! I uploaded the new version
> > to Debian just moments ago.
> >
> > The new build should appear in 'Debian unstable'[0] within the next few
> > hours, and the binary packages will migrate to the various Debian
> > deployment pages (and to Ubuntu's next version) from there.
> >
> > I am also your friendly Ubuntu maintainer, and I will be deploying the
> > new builds to the Ubuntu-Hams-Updates archive[1] for the four most
> > recent Ubuntu releases, once they finish building in my staging
> > archive[2], some hours from now.
> >
> > I'll let you know when all the packages are built, if you'd like to make
> > an announcement. :-)
> >
> > 73 de KA6MAL
>
> Spectacular! We try to stay out of the distro-specific packaging
> requirements and processes - it's just too much to keep up with. But
> obviously we like if most of our users are able to install (and stay
> up-to-date) just via the nice friendly package manager. Not all hams
> (even on Linux) are 100% comfortable building from source. I'll see if
> our ARRL contacts are interested in putting a note saying something like
> "on Debian or Ubuntu, you can just install the 'trustedqsl' package" on
> their instructions page.
>
> We have several other big features planned for further releases over the
> next several months, so we'll be sure to keep you "in the loop" on that
> front. To that end, is there anything packaging-specific that you'd like
> to see in TrustedQSL? Something just occurred to me, which is a way to
> turn off update-checking for maintainer builds (so it doesn't present a
> source tarball; the user should upgrade through the package system if
> that's how he got it) - I'll put that on-track for the next version. Do
> you have any other suggestions (including general/overall ones)?
>
> 73,
> -Robert, KC2YWE
>
Reply to: